Q&A With Director,Scott Derrickson, of the new movie
The Exorcism of Emily Rose
1. Tell us a bit about the film, The Exorcism of Emily Rose.
It's the story of a young girl who dies after
undergoing an exorcism that has been sanctioned by the
Catholic church, and the priest who performed the
exorcsim is put on trial for negligent homicide. The
film is part horror/thriller, and part courtroom
drama. It is an investigation into the girl's
condition, exploring whether or not she was really
possessed, or possibly epileptic and psychotic. It's
very scary, but in a realistic way that is not
over-the-top or exploitive.
2. Coming off directing Hellraiser: Inferno, why did you choose to write/direct this film? What type of research did you haveto do to bring it to the big screen?
I chose to write and direct this film because I saw within it the potential to tell a compelling and deeply meaningful story. It's based on a real event, and I wanted to do justice to that event by creating a quality film that made people think. I am a big fan of the horror genre, but far too often, horror directors sell the genre short by focusing only on visual effects and gore. I felt that this story was an opportunity to make something really frightening, yet also visually beautiful and rich with ideas.
The research phase of this project was pretty
exhaustive. I read over two dozen books on possession
and exorcism, because I wanted to know everything
there is to know about the subject. I also saw a lot
of photographs and videotapes of actual exorcisms.
That phase of the project was very oppressive -- I
never want to delve that deep into such dark material
again. But it was worth it. Once the writing began,
the script was very fulfilling to work on, as was the
film itself.
3. With the horror genre producing films like Scream, how did you approach writing the script and directing the cast?
The script isn't formulaic like most horror films, because it's broken up into a fragmented narrative. The challenge with doing something like that is to keep it from feeling to messy or disjointed. And it's a hybrid -- part horror, part courtroom -- so moving between those two genres was also a big danger. The goal was to create seemlessness by never letting the tension drop to far. All horror films rise and fall in their intensity, but I wanted to keep it from ever falling to far. Movies like "Scream" are pure entertainment, without much thematic depth or realism. This film is very different. It's all feels quite real, and it's not at all campy or fillled with typical horror-film humor.
Directing the cast was one of the great pleasures of
the film. With seasoned pros like Laura Linney and
Tom Wilkenson, most of what I did was block their
movements to maximize the visual energy of the film.
Occasionally I would direct their acting, but not too
often. With actors that good, you can often just stay
out of their way. I think the greatest pleasure I had
during the shooting of the film was just watching the
scenes between Laura and Tom unfold. I had never
watched actors of that caliber up close like that
before, and it was just incredible. To watch them
bring your words to life was so fantastic. Jennifer
Carpenter, who is also an amazing actress, demanded a
lot more from me than Laura, Tom, and Campbell Scott,
because her role was so dependent upon the directorial
vision of the film. Jennifer and I spent a lot of
time rehearsing alone, and also with the other actors
she had scenes with. We only had 40 days to shoot the
film, so I wanted to make sure that Jennifer and I had
already worked out how she was going to do the
possession and exorcism scenes. I knew we wouldn't
have much time to rehearse them on the set. I had a
lot of ideas from the start, but so did she. It was
really thrilling, breaking down those scenes with her
and watching them come to life. But in the end, the
greatest moments Jennifer has in the film are things
she did very spontaniously while we were shooting. I
think she will really blow people away with what she
does in this picture.
4. What made you choose Laura Linney, Tom Wilkinson, & Campbell Scott as your principle actors/actress for the film?
Well, they are all astonishing actors, and they all
just seemed perfect for the roles. And I also wanted
to make a smart, artful movie. I knew that those
actors would keep the material elevated, and would
never drage it down. Laura was first suggested to me
by the head of the studio, and the more I thought
about it, the more I realized that there was no way
the film wouldn't be smart with her in it. She was no
easy sell, though -- I had to spend several hours with
her, describing my vision for the film and just what
kind of movie I wanted to make. She asked me very
incisive questions, and wanted to make sure that the
film I was going make would be intelligent and
ideologically balanced. After that, Tom Wilkinson
read the script, and just loved it, so he came on
board. I can't imagine anyome being better at that
role than Tom. And then Laura suggested both Campbell
and Jennifer. I loved the idea of Campbell, as I had
been a fan of his for years. And Laura knew Jennifer
because she had done "The Crucible" on broadway with
her. When Jennifer came in for her call-back
audition, I knew before she was finished that I was
going to cast her. The four of them are much of what
makes the film work. In my opinion, they are as good
as actors get.
5. After watching this film, how do you want people to walk away from it?
I want them to be asking themselves what they believe
about the case, and about the larger issues it
addresses. Was Emily possessed? Should the priest be
convincted? Does the spiritual realm exist? Do
demons, the devil, and God exist? If so, or if not,
what are the implications of that? What I want, pure
and simple, is for people to come away from the film
entertained, but also asking themselves (and the
person they attended the film with) meaningful
questions.
6. Was your intention for the audience to figure out for themselves if Emily Rose is really possessed? What kind of restrictions did you put on yourself and did you find it challenging?
As I just said, I very much want them to figure out
for themselves what they believe about the story. The
main restriction I put on myself as the director was
to not propogate my own point of view. I wanted
everyone who sees the film to feel that their point of
view has a place in the movie. I found that
challenging, but I also had a lot of help from Paul
Boardman, the co-writer and one of the producers of
the film. Paul and I have very different opinions
about most spiritual and religious subjects, so there
is an inevitable balance that comes out of that.
Still, what was most challenging was making the
medical/non-religious perspective interesting and
compelling. The spiritual perspecitve of possession
and exorcism is so explosive and visceral, I had to
make sure that the other perspective was equally
compelling. Campbell Scott really carries the burden
of that as the prosecutor in the film. His arguments
and the visions he paints for the audience are great,
and yet he never falls into typical over-the-top
lawyer speeches. He carries that part of the film
really well, I think...
The Exorcism of Emily Rose hit theaters September 9th nationwide. To watch the trailer of the movie click here.
